Climate alarmist researchers advocate ‘carbon capture’ using genetically-enhanced crops  

Photosynthesis [image credit: Nefronus @ Wikipedia]

” data-image-caption=”" data-medium-file=”https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/photosynth1.png?w=300″ data-large-file=”https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/photosynth1.png?w=354″ src=”https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/photosynth1.png?w=300″ alt=”Photosynthesis” width=”300″ height=”300″ class=”alignright size-medium wp-image-63636″ srcset=”https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/photosynth1.png?w=300 300w, https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/photosynth1.png?w=150 150w, https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/photosynth1.png 354w” sizes=”(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px” />
This ignores the fact that growth in nature prefers as much carbon dioxide as possible, up to levels way above where we are now, for photosynthesis to work efficiently. Wasting time and money on so-called carbon capture projects in the hope of changing the weather is always going to be a loser.
– – –
UC San Diego researchers say genetically-enhanced crops of plants featuring enlarged roots present an opportunity for society to achieve a needed drawdown of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

A new study from scientists at UC San Diego’s Scripps Institution of Oceanography and School of Global Policy and Strategy (GPS) also compares this agricultural solution to other proposed methods of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) as a way of showing what needs to happen to address the climate crisis on a global scale, says Phys.org.

The paper is published in the journal Environmental Research Letters.

Scientists contributing to the most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report have estimated that if society is to have a chance at counteracting global CO2 emissions, it must find a way to remove between five and 16 billion tons of the greenhouse gas every year.

That would need to be done in addition to the task of stopping or substantially slowing how much greenhouse gas society continues to add to the atmosphere daily.

Failure to do this in a timely manner puts the planet at risk of experiencing catastrophic changes in weather, crop failures and spread of diseases.

Despite the magnitude of the challenge, nobody has offered a theory to explain how quickly such technologies can scale under real world conditions, said study lead author Daniela Faggiani-Dias, a climate scientist at Scripps Oceanography and UC San Diego’s Deep Decarbonization Initiative.

Following an analysis, so-called carbon-enhanced crops could, within 13 years of first adoption, remove 0.9–1.2 gigatons annually, the research team said. That amount is about seven times larger than all CO2 offsets supplied today to the global market.
“There is a consensus in the scientific community that we will have to scale CDR substantially to reach net zero—on top of drastically reducing our greenhouse gas emissions,” said Faggiani-Dias.

“Yet, research on how CDR can realistically scale—considering not only technical limits, but also scale-up speed and feasible pathways—is very thin. And this is what is new about our study.

“We provide a detailed analysis of the CDR scaling challenge and propose a framework to estimate how quickly and to what extent emerging, highly uncertain technologies might scale. While our analysis focuses on carbon-enhanced crops, the framework is generalizable across CDR approaches and helps to surface key uncertainties in scale-up potential.”

Full article here.