A Three-Prong Approach to Paranormal Research

Researching Spooky Stuff at The Gray Barker Archives

Summary: The process of researching haunted locations can be summed up in three main areas: 1. STORIES AND EXPERIENCES, 2. HISTORICAL DOCUMENTATION, and 3. DATA COLLECTION. An investigation usually starts with the reputation of a location for being haunted, and an examination of the stories and witness experiences associated with it. It is then followed up by researching the history of the location and collecting data, such as EMF readings, photographs, EVP recordings, etc. Further, these three ‘prongs’ are not linear. For example, some will collect data before looking into the history. More often than not, investigators will circle back around as new information is uncovered. In a perfect scenario, all three areas will interconnect, supporting and backing each other up. However, we all know that this trifecta rarely occurs; fortunately, that doesn’t mean that a location or an investigation does not have value.

It’s no secret that I am fascinated with anything and everything weird and spooky! Theresa’s Haunted History of the Tri-State exists as a way to document and share a gamut of strange and unusual topics. UFOs, cryptids, psychic phenomena, and Fortean events are just some of the subjects that have found a home here on my blog. But, throughout my work in this field, the study of ghosts and hauntings has remained my main focus.

For today’s post, I thought I’d do a commentary on what I consider to be the ideal trifecta in regard to the investigation and research of haunted locations. As both a researcher AND a paranormal field investigator, a multitude of allegedly haunted sites come across my radar on a regular basis. I love hearing about potentially haunted places and researching the history behind them. However, what makes a location REALLY pique my interest? What makes me excited to actually do on-site investigation research?

Not all haunted locations are created equal. Aside from investigative logistics, such as accessibility, health/safety concerns, and other external variables, some places just make for a better research subject. I am a believer that any place has the potential for paranormal activity, but as a serious researcher, I need a reason to invest in the study of a particular property. That reason usually starts with the ghost stories and personal experiences reported by various witnesses.

STORIES AND EXPERIENCES:

I’m sure you’ve had someone tell you about a great haunted location they know of…but when you ask them to describe the activity, they really can’t tell you much about what actually goes on there. They might stress the idea that the place is old and creepy, and/or the fact that someone died there. If you get REALLY lucky, they might have mentioned they felt ‘something.’ I do appreciate getting these types of tips from people. I love when people get excited about the paranormal, and I always love talking about the paranormal with others. It’s awesome whenever someone knows what I do and is eager to share their knowledge of haunted locations with me. And to be fair, some of these places have ended up being awesome investigations, especially when they haven’t been investigated before by anyone.

However, it’s so much easier when a location already has an established history of specific paranormal activity. To maximize the research process, I need to know exactly why the location is believed to be haunted. Are there legends of untimely death, unrequited love, or other acts of violence and tragedy? Do locals tell of apparitions roaming the grounds, unearthly screams piercing the veil, or mysterious disappearances? Are these legends widespread and well-known, dating back a number of years? Have they been previously documented in writing, and where?

I also need to know what people are actually experiencing. Are the owners/visitors/others related to the property seeing anything? Hearing anything? Smelling anything? Do these experiences tend to back up the ghost stories told about the location, or are they unrelated? Can recent witnesses be located and interviewed about their experiences?

The combination of reported stories and personal experiences not only show that a location has a sustained history of activity (as opposed to just a one-off experience), but will show investigators patterns of that activity, such as what time of day activity seems to occur, or whether or not activity seems to happen only to certain people. This data can be used to plan an optimal investigation experience, focused on recreating the specific conditions that seem conducive to activity. It also allows investigators to isolate specific incidents of activity to try to recreate for the purpose of debunking, or finding natural explanations. Further, these tales and experiences can offer clues into who or what is haunting the location, and why. Who is that woman in white who silently ascends the stairs night after night?

This investigation process nearly always starts with stories and experiences (for the exception, please see my article on Ghost Hunting Vs. Paranormal Investigation). It is a jumping off point for the rest of your research, which, based on personal beliefs, may look slightly different from mine, and vary from case to case. But, in general, I tend to head into the realm of historical documentation from here. It’s important to note, however, that these three areas are very interdependent. This will be discussed in greater detail later on, but let’s first take a look at historical documentation. 

Waverly Hills  Estes Method

HISTORICAL DOCUMENTATION:

Historical research is MY favorite part of paranormal investigation. I love taking a deep dive into the people and events tied to the property. I want to know who lived there, who died there, who worked there, who visited, and why any of them might be sticking around. I want to go further into just their names and dates of deaths; I want to know what they did for a living, what church they went to, what they did in the spare time. Did they have any pets or belong to any organizations? What tragedies touched their lives? 

There are several advantages of conducting historical research before the on-site investigation. Historical research can provide names and details of your suspected ghost. This information can then be used to tailor specific questions for EVP and/or spirit box sessions, or be used in choosing what type of trigger objects a suspected ghost may most likely interact with. Perhaps most importantly, historical research can shed some light on the stories and experiences. Many, MANY times throughout my research, I’ve found that what is told and accepted as ‘fact’ for the background of a location is not quite accurate. Not every old house was used as a Civil War hospital, and that ‘woman in white’ who allegedly took her own life when her betrothed died in the war? Well, her death certificate and obituary both say she died of cancer in her 80s.

It’s definitely satisfying being able to shed some truth to the folklore (a major goal of Theresa’s Haunted History which I will probably delve deeper into in another post), but nothing feels greater than actually finding primary documentation that supports the claims of activity. I remember high-fiving a colleague and then feeling REALLY guilty about my sheer joy upon finding a newspaper article discussing the tragic death of a toddler that up until that point, hadn’t been proven. While I wasn’t celebrating the tragedy itself, I was relieved to have that vindication of a widely-told story actually being true.

When the historical documentation backs up the stories, it is certainly a good sign that the site deserves on-site investigation, which brings us to our third and final area: Data collection. 

DATA COLLECTION: 

We have a location with a dark and verifiable history, with stories and experiences to match. That’s awesome and will definitely qualify to be featured here on Theresa’s Haunted History! And, given that permission can be obtained, most likely we’ll want to come investigate that location. As cool as the case already sounds, what would make it PERFECT would be to collect data and potential evidence that can give a glimpse of scientific validity to the claims. Any and all potential evidence collected on site would be awesome—but to have an EVP giving a verified name, or a photo clearly showing the suspected entity is the Holy Grail, and the perfect completion to the perfect trifecta: historical documentation AND physical evidence to back up the legends and lore. 

Unfortunately, data collection, while it should be very scientifically sound and regulated, isn’t infallible, especially in regard to paranormal research. An interesting piece of potential evidence or data doesn’t necessarily conclude that a location is haunted or that ghosts exist. And data might not necessarily correlate to personal experiences and documented history. Often, we get ‘hits’ on EVP or the Spirit Box giving ‘random’ names. These might just be completely random. They might be the product of misinterpretation by investigators (for example, Jane and Shane sound A LOT alike on audio). In some schools of thought, they may be examples of telepathy on the part of those present, as opposed to proof of afterlife communication. Or, it could simply be information that has yet to be discovered.

That’s when we have to circle back. More historical research needs to be done, using the new information as clues. As people continue to have experiences and tell stories about the location, that data also needs to be documented and taken into consideration. Very rarely is a case marked ‘complete,’ because as long as the location still exists, there is the potential for additional stories and experiences. And as long as I’m still researching, I will continue to seek out as much documentation and data as I can. 

With that, I’ll wrap up this overly long blog post! Good luck with your own investigations and research, and as always, stay spooky my friends! 

Source: http://theresashauntedhistoryofthetri-state.blogspot.com/2025/04/a-three-prong-approach-to-paranormal.html