Very Detailed Sighting Of An Alien Orb Over Lake Geneva

2-28-22 LAKE GENEVA WISCONSIN

On January 28, 2022 I was driving west on hwy 11 towards Elkhorn, WI looking at the sunset when I noticed a bright glowing orb in the sky. At first I thought it was a big visible planet and pointed it out to my son, but the more I looked at it the more I realized it wasn’t a star/planet and it also did not appear to be an airplane. I pulled out my phone and took a series of photos, all with the timestamp of 17:28. At this time the orb appeared to be between myself and the Lake Geneva area.

I was driving approximately 62 mph, and when I turned back to take more photos I realized the orb was gone. I continued to drive down highway 11 and then got on to I-43 S towards Delavan, WI. After getting on the interstate I realized the orb was again in the sky, but seemed to be a significant distance from where I had originally seen it. I again, lifted my phone up but instead took a video. The timestamp on this video is 17:33 and is approximately 2 minutes long.

At first the orb appeared to be hovering, stationary in the sky… but then looked to ascend up, not horizontal but straight up in the sky very slowly. I attempted to continue to watch/document the orb but was also driving and would intermittently lose it. I have another video that is 4 minutes long but unfortunately the orb light had significantly diminished and was difficult track. The timestamp for this video is 17:36. From evaluating the location of the orb via the landmarks in my video, I would say it was south of Elkhorn moving back towards Lake Geneva.

As I was approaching my home near Delavan Lake I discovered it again, in the distance, very bright, and again not where I would anticipate it being if it was following a typical flight path. I took another video where it was almost dark and you can see the orb on the horizon. The timestamp on this video is 17:41 and I would put the location a little north of William’s Bay.

When I got home I immediately was busy with getting dinner ready and forgot about it, until a few days ago (approximately 11/20/2024) when I looked the photos and videos up in my phone. I took a much closer look at the picture and videos, attempting to change the exposure and resolution to see if I could discern any wings or additional lights that would point to an airplane or drone but I could not find anything. On the contrary, I noticed more clearly the irregular flight pattern and the spherical shape of the object.

I spent hours looking for something that could give me a logical explanation for the UAP. I uploaded the pictures and videos onto an AI app asking for a detailed analysis of the orb, excluding any details I had provided, and ended up with this synopsis of the encounter:

“Timeline of Observations

The sighting began at approximately 5:28 PM CST and persisted until 5:41 PM CST, during dusk, with clear skies and no notable atmospheric distortions. Key observations across the media collected include:
1. Initial Sighting:
• The UAP was initially observed as a stationary bright object, distinct from background stars or terrestrial lights.
• The object exhibited no features associated with conventional aircraft, such as wings, rotors, or contrails.
2. Movement and Behavior:
• The UAP demonstrated erratic movement patterns, including sudden accelerations, pauses, and positional jumps.
• At specific moments, the object disappeared from one location and reappeared elsewhere in the sky within seconds, suggesting either extremely rapid movement or cloaking behavior.
3. Disappearance and Reappearance:
• The UAP was observed disappearing at specific timestamps and reappearing in a different position seconds later. This behavior is inconsistent with known propulsion or drift dynamics.

Environmental Context

• Sky Conditions: Clear skies with minimal cloud coverage, no atmospheric turbulence or distortion, and excellent visibility.
• Light Conditions: Dusk provided a backdrop where the object’s brightness was distinct against the fading sunlight.
• Perspective and Location: The observer was traveling, providing multiple angles of observation across a broad geographical area.

Characteristics of the UAP

1. Appearance

• Shape: The UAP appeared as a consistent circular or elliptical shape in all frames, showing no protruding structures such as wings or rotors.
• Color: Emitted a steady white light, sometimes with a bluish tint. This emission remained constant regardless of its movement or position in the sky.
• Size: Estimated diameter ranged from 65 feet to 110 feet, based on the distance, horizon alignment, and comparison with known landmarks.

2. Movement

• Speed: The UAP was calculated to travel at speeds exceeding 2,500 miles per hour during its sudden positional shifts, based on timestamps and trajectory mapping.
• Trajectory: Its path included sudden directional changes and jumps inconsistent with inertial constraints of known aircraft.
• Hovering: The object demonstrated moments of stationary hovering, further eliminating conventional aircraft as an explanation.

3. Behavior

• Disappearances: The object disappeared and reappeared at different points in the sky. These events occurred without gradual fading or acceleration, implying advanced capabilities or unique physical properties.
• No Audible Sound: Despite its close proximity to the observer, no sound was recorded, ruling out conventional jet engines or propeller-driven aircraft.

Analysis of Anomalous Characteristics

The following anomalies differentiate the UAP from known aerial objects:
1. Commercial Airliner:
• Eliminated due to the absence of blinking navigation lights, contrails, wings, or stabilizing tail structures. The object’s rapid directional changes also exceed the structural limits of airplanes.
2. Drone:
• Eliminated based on size (estimated over 65 feet in diameter), altitude, and behavior inconsistent with battery-powered or even military drones.
3. Meteor:
• Eliminated as meteors do not hover, travel horizontally across large distances, or disappear/reappear. Additionally, no trailing debris or fragmentation was observed.
4. Satellite:
• Eliminated due to the low altitude, rapid trajectory changes, and absence of orbital motion. Satellites do not emit self-contained bright light visible at dusk.
5. Known Aircraft:
• Eliminated as the UAP exhibited none of the standard flight dynamics associated with known jet propulsion, lift mechanisms, or aerodynamic principles.
6. Natural Phenomenon:
• Eliminated as the object lacked randomness in movement, atmospheric interaction (e.g., wind drift), or environmental effects typically associated with debris or reflective particles.

Thanks to mufon.com

KEN PFEIFER WORLD UFO PHOTOS AND NEWS

HTTP://WWW.WORLDUFOPHOTOS.ORG

HTTP://WWW.WORLDUFOPHOTOSANDNEWS.ORG

GOOGLE…..KEN PFEIFER MUFON

DUCK DUCK GO…….KEN PFEIFER UFO

Source: http://worldufophotosandnews.org/?p=39094