The Judicial Coup D’etat is a National Emergency

“Currently, district court judges have assumed the mantle of Secretary of Defense, Secretary of State, Secretary of Homeland Security and Commander-in-Chief. Each day, they change the foreign policy, economic, staffing and national security policies of the Administration. Each day the nation arises to see what the craziest unelected local federal judge has decided the policies of the government of the United States shall be. It is madness. It is lunacy. It is pure lawlessness. It is the gravest assault on democracy. It must and will end.” (Stephen Miller)

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis calls on Congress to strip the jurisdiction of federal courts to decide the cases dictating Trump’s executive policies.

Governor Ron DeSantis: “Congress has the authority to strip jurisdiction of the federal courts to decide these cases in the first place.

The sabotaging of President Trump’s agenda by “resistance” judges was predictable — why no jurisdiction-stripping bills tee’d up at the onset of this Congress?”

Look at these statistics on national injunctions imposed by District Court judges from a recent Harvard Law Review article. 67% of all injunctions this century came against President Trump in his first term and 92% were imposed by Democrat-appointed judges. HT @bhweingarten… pic.twitter.com/X8ytux5g4i

— Eric Teetsel (@EricTeetsel) March 19, 2025

Impeaching a district court judge = 67 Senate votes.

Defunding a District Court = 51 Senate votes.

DEFUND the courts with activist judges.

Money talks.

— Mila Joy (@MilaLovesJoe) March 19, 2025

There are 94 district courts in the United States. These courts are the general trial courts of the federal court system, and each state has at least one district court, while some larger states have multiple districts (e.g., California, Texas, and New York each have four). Additionally, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico each have their own district court, and there are district courts in the territories of Guam, the Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands.

Yes, Congress has the authority to eliminate a single district court because the Constitution grants Congress the power to establish and structure the federal judiciary below the Supreme Court. Article III, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution states that “The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” This gives Congress broad discretion to create, modify, or abolish federal district courts as it sees fit. (X)

Congress has the authority to strip jurisdiction of the federal courts to decide these cases in the first place.

The sabotaging of President Trump’s agenda by “resistance” judges was predictable — why no jurisdiction-stripping bills tee’d up at the onset of this Congress? https://t.co/OscAkpXgeo

— Ron DeSantis (@RonDeSantis) March 19, 2025

Because the Chief Justice refuses to get his judicial house in order, Congress has to do it for him. https://t.co/RKF20eUmja

— Mike Davis (@mrddmia) March 18, 2025

Conservative Treehouse:

It’s important to remember that the inferior courts do not work for or report to the Supreme Court.

CONGRESS creates the inferior courts and as such, Congress can eliminate courts, add courts, and control funding of the courts. Congress also can impeach. And a key element of impeachment is the hearings process.

A hearings process that subpoenas Federal district court judges to testify before Congress would cast a lot of sunlight on the corrupt Judicial-Lawfare-Complex.

Could the end result be impeachment? Certainly, but that’s not necessarily the goal.

It could also lead to something better in the long run: descope of the Federal court system which has grown bloated, corrupt, and arrogant because it answers to nobody.

They’re the 3rd branch of government for a reason – they are not elected by anyone and therefore hold the least amount of power when it comes to governance. SCOTUS doesn’t even control their own budget. They can’t levy taxes. They can’t declare war. They can’t decide what constitutes citizenship.

The answer to all of this is sunlight.

Simply compel Boasberg to testify in open public hearings about his role in Lawfare and his interpretation of the Federal district court’s ability to direct the actions of the Commander in Chief, issue “nationwide injunctions” and so forth. Then let’s get into his direct role in Lawfare.

Roberts wants to pretend impeachment of Boasberg is about a “political disagreement”, but it is not.

This is a judicial coup d’etat we are witnessing. And the only way to stop it is to descope the judiciary and limit its ability to issue injunctions.

If crimes are discovered, such as aiding and abetting terrorist organizations, the judges should be removed. Judges can “obstruct justice” too. They are not Jesus in black robes. They are every bit as tempted by corruption (perhaps more so because they are deemed infallible by the Chief Justice) as any politician.

Impeach Boasberg. Start there. Start the process…

Related: Biden Judge Halts Trump’s Military Trans Ban

ANOTHER Obama Judge: Blocks EPA Chief Lee Zeldin From Canceling BILLIONS in Climate Hoax Grants

JUDICIAL TYRANNY: Obama Judge Orders Trump Admin. to Reinstate UNAID

Another Obama Judge Forces Govt to Rehire 24,500 Fired Workers

One of Biden’s Final Appointments, First Federal Muslim Judge Judge Amir Ali Overrules Trump’s Foreign Aid Freeze, Tax Dollars to Jihad To Flow Again

Radical Leftwing Judges’ Lawless Bans On Trump’s Clearly Legal Executive Actions Have Extremist Records