If you can’t see the forest, you can’t save the trees: Understanding and Measuring Islam and communism’s dominance over the West

Suddenly that old expression, “Can’t see the forest for the trees” makes a little sense.

The other day we posted a couple of items on the state of the communist revolution in Germany. Unfortunately, Rumble is up and down a lot this past several days, so the video of Dr. Thoma in the post appears intermittently.

But in our post or the RAIR article, it refers to a secret report by the current government which justifies declaring the only non-leftist party a criminal entity. That report can now be seen here after it was ‘released’ to the public.

Although I cannot get it to load at the moment, those who can tell me it is interesting as it is pure allegations with no actual evidence, that any school kid could have written it in a few hours, that it was clearly made with Chat GPT and most interestingly, there are NO REDACTIONS AT ALL including names or other indications of state censorship which at this point we now find, even on grocery lists. Had it been leaked, the lack of censorship would make more sense. But as it was released after ‘pressure’ its a data point that this is purely fabricated in order to justify disenfranchising the AfD.

At this point its worth a point form dive into what communism is. It won’t be detailed because anyone who reads this site already gets it. But as I have had multiple conversations with strangers in the past few weeks where I introduced the notion that certain countries were nascent communist states such as Great Britain, Canada and Germany and I get a good initial degree of incredulity, it may be worth a point-form explanation of how people have been misled to believe communism is, and what in fact it actually is.

The interesting thing is that when presented with a few facts, you get a lot of stunned silence back when they realize that they may have been incorrect for all these years.

One of the easy go-to points is the criminalizing of opinion which is in opposition to state narratives. Now even those who believe that the state narratives are factually correct, will hesitate to say that making it a crime to present evidence to the contrary is under the rubric of a “free and democratic society”.

Evidence of this is pretty easy. Let’s say you oppose the Canadian and British state sacrament of abortion. You can now be arrested and jailed for praying inside your own home if it is near an abortion assembly line.

A Canadian priest has been taken to jail on a couple of occasions for having a sign within the forbidden zone of a block or so near an abortion facility merely advocating for freedom of speech and nothing else. That priest and his sign is occasionally shown by this site as a banner actually. He passed away some years ago now. Also people have been arrested just for standing near an abortion facility in Great Britain and admitting to police that they were silently praying when asked why they were there. Hardly a protest. Hardly an impediment to a medical procedure. But very very communist. One must not oppose a state narrative. It is always a much bigger crime than, well, crime is.

Another fun line of conversation is explaining to people that the Nazis were not in any way whatsoever “right wing” far or moderate. The conversation usually moves along quickly when you ask them to name one communist state where there is freedom of speech and any kind of actual equality of citizens and distribution of wealth based on any kind of merit. Then point put that Hitler’s Nuremberg speeches where pretty much all Karl Marx chapter and verse with class warfare etc. etc. and that the Nazis and Soviet Union where allies at first.

That the Nazis had all the benchmarks of a communist society with minor variations than any kind of libertarian polity, which is the genuine far right wing article. Brutal violent state enforced narratives, and criteria for success/survival that have nothing to do with actual merit but based on some abstract criteria like race, religion, ethnicity or beliefs. Not that these things don’t have real world consequences. They most certainly all do. But in a free society these things sort themselves out based on their own momentum and for the betterment of all involved as a general rule.

In other words, people who are good at activity A tend to dominate activity A and people who are not, don’t. The rest of the public understands that and harbours no resentment against the group which typically is at the top of that field, because they either worked harder, were more motivated, or were more naturally talented at that activity. Communist societies insist that all people are born tabula rasa, and therefore, anyone who is better at anything than anyone else is because of ‘Systemic XXXXXX” where you can plug in anything you want after systemic. Recently it’s racism. But it used to be lots of other things, usually class related. The result? Massive resentment and hatred at anyone who succeeds at anything.

Eugyppius who does the best writing on Germany has this update today:

Spy agency report on the alleged “extremism” of Alternative für Deutschland turns out to be so stupid that it destroys all momentum for banning the party

The previously secret dossier assembled by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution leaked on Tuesday. It is unbelievably retarded.

In my last post, I wrote that “The campaign to ban Alternative für Deutschland is not going well.” Today – a mere seventy-two hours later – you could say that the campaign to ban Alternative für Deutschland is all but dead. This is because the people most committed to banning the AfD also happen to be some of the stupidest, most incompetent legal and political operators the world has ever seen. Their incompetence is so enormous that I am for once willing to entertain conspiracy theories as to why they might have undermined their own project. It is that bad.

Read the rest at his substack linked above. But you get the idea. The German state is so casual about its dialectics that it can invent and publish the sloppiest lies to disenfranchise counter-revolutionaries with no real fear of it being an impediment.

But our focus is understanding what is happening across the West, most notably in Germany, Australia, Canada and the UK with the UK possibly being the most advanced of the communist revolution. And by advanced I mean the shift from a Socratic system to a dialectical one. From a people’s self governance polity to an all powerful state which dictates reality itself. Also where they are in terms of moving from Covert to Overt communistic systems.

Also what things constitute a crime. I am about to interview a man who was fined 120K$ by the state of Canada for election interference. Why? He brought Jordan Peterson to Alberta to present a talk on things as Peterson sees it. We know that theft in leftist US states and Canada overall is not a crime, somewhat depending on who you are. Ask anyone who works retail what happens to people who get caught stealing and what they are prevented from doing to people who are stealing.

And then look at sentences meted out to people who simply say things which are true that defy state narratives. Particularly on Islam these days. But it might easily be extended to the CO2 narrative attack at any time. They are already calling those who present factual evidence of the lack of CO2 caused warming, ‘denialists’ and Holocaust deniers are already criminals in Germany. Which itself is a crime. People should be able to believe what they want, and making it a crime not to, is more in keeping with he Nazis than false claims about the genocide of the Jewish people in Nazi occupied lands. Not to mention that it fuels suspicions that there may be something to it. After all, they called serious carrier scientists, even ones who were world class vaccinologist and even one Nobel Prize winner in Medicine, “Anti-vaxxers” for defying the state narrative, and while they were not criminally prosecuted, having a doctor lose his licence is probably a much bigger punishment than a fine or even a few months in jail.

It is destroying them permanently in some aspects.

Which takes us to the processes themselves. Hearings or trials which used to be based on Socratic principles, where “truth was always an absolute defence”, something lawyers still like to trumpet now and again, but a lot more quietly than they used to, now is about manipulating the process to achieve a predetermined political outcome.

Failure to understand what is taking place but complaining about the individual events within it, is colour commentary. And some argue controlled opposition. If you don’t know a war is being waged upon you, then you cannot possibly fight back let alone win.

Islam for instance is waging a war against the rest of the world, because it has to. Islam is obliged to do nothing else but conquer the world for Islam, using every means possible. We used to say that we are losing to Jihad because we treat a military problem as if it was a law and order one. That was true then. But now we don’t even treat it as a law and order problem.

Eeyore for Vlad.

Source: https://vladtepesblog.com/2025/05/15/if-you-cant-see-the-forest-you-cant-save-the-trees-understanding-and-measuring-islam-and-communisms-dominance-over-the-west/