UN and Wikipedia as agents of Islamic terror, feeble attempt by Loblaws to stop theft, Anti-free speech propaganda as push back from Vance, and 2 personal essays on Canada 51 and booing the US anthem

First, a quick note about Reader’s Links.

The reader’s Links post is created in bunches to auto publish each night at a minute after midnight. There are a lot of little steps to do that for each one. Lots of mouse clicks and settings in order to make sure it publishes at the right time and the right content.

Yesterday I was creating a bunch of them in order to get ahead of them so I can rest knowing there are weeks and weeks ready to go, and made a mistake on the month and the March something or other went out as Feb. and the site sent it to everyone.

Sorry about the confusion.

I should probably put this video on the Substack as it is from 2010 at the latest. But it’s worth seeing as it is a terrific and accurate condemnation of the United Nations “Human Rights Commission”, a dialectic organization to destroy individual human rights and create collective human rights for communism and Islam. I believe this speech was subsequently banned or stricken from the records at the UN. Following that, a short essay on the UN’s role in supporting terrorist groups.

The following is a short article on how Wikipedia is also used as a weapon for Islamic terror. If you cannot reach the article, try turning off your VPN. I can personally assure you this site is safe. But it blocks some VPN servers that are being used for pen testing or DDoS attacks.

The Misrepresentation of Gaza’s Famine: Wikipedia’s Role and the Impact on Jewish Communities

2. Avi Yemeni exposes other Islamic doctors. This has happened in Canada numerous times. Once, a doctor in a Toronto Jewish hospital was caught giving a sermon about finding and killing all the Jews. The Toronto Star hired a known fake translator and claimed he was wrongly translated. Honest Reporting busted both the ‘imam’ and the Toronto Star for their deception in a back-and-forth that was quite a thing. It is all here on this site.

? Video of ANOTHER doctor in a public hospital GLORIFYING terrorism

This time in Melbourne

Dr Mohamed Ghilan was stood down from The Alfred after several doctors raised alarm bells, but Ahpra again has failed the community

SIGN & SHARE https://t.co/uGABTzsHcM NOW! pic.twitter.com/NQEu3ZuGR2

— Avi Yemini (@OzraeliAvi) February 17, 2025

3. My prediction: Thieves and even violent people will stop, smile and pose for the cameras, and carry on doing whatever they want, safe and secure in the knowledge that nothing whatsoever will happen to them, unless they are law abiding, hard working middle class people in a dispute with staff for something real or imagined. Then the camera footage will ruin their lives.

Loblaw has announced employees at a Real Canadian Superstore and Shoppers Drug Mart in Abbotsford will start wearing body cameras in what the company says is an effort to curb crime and violence.https://t.co/zHZseUFXTq

— CKNW (@CKNW) February 15, 2025

4. Thee is ridiculous but clearly dialectical push back on Vance’s spectacular speech in Europe at a security conference. Some from Europe, but lots from US media as well.

This is from Face the Nation. Note that everything she says is a dialectic attack on reality in order to demonize freedom of speech and promote authoritarian censorship by enforcing a narrative on history.

This is the most bizarre but also the most twisted exchange ?

Is the media now trying to say that the Holocaust was caused by… Free Speech? (The literal opposite of Nazi Germany)@marcorubio handles it perfectly. pic.twitter.com/AHhkwoZv2Y

— Kosher?? (@koshercockney) February 17, 2025

60 Minutes. This is a superb example of dialectics. The gentle nudging of truth and reality into a justification for authoritarian controls by the state.

“Free speech needs boundaries… Without boundaries, a very small group of people can rely on endless freedom to say anything that they want, while everyone else is scared and intimidated,” says Josephine Ballon, CEO of HateAid. https://t.co/YjlBa7YJ3s pic.twitter.com/xqI88oiiO2

— 60 Minutes (@60Minutes) February 17, 2025

There is a deceptively edited clip of chairman of the Munich Security Conference all over Twitter in tears, apparently over vance’s speech. This is highly annoying because what he in fact did say about Vance’s speech was important in that we need to see how far to the left, Europe has swung. But they made it about his breaking down in tears, which he did not do until the end after he announced his retirement. This kind of enemy propaganda is frustrating as it distracts from what is important, to a base mockery at an emotional level. Because they left the part in about Zelensky. I am going to guess this was a Russian propaganda effort. Annoying as that is, let’s be grateful they aren’t actually attacking us except through classic Soviet era disinformation efforts so far.

VERY large Twitter accounts are reposting this propaganda by the way.

The chairman of the Munich Security Conference literally broke down in tears today over JD Vance’s speech on Friday criticising European leaders.

Europe is currently being governed by extremely unstable and unserious people. pic.twitter.com/QVsLNlyPQ7

— Cillian (@CilComLFC) February 17, 2025

A longer version of his speech

Brian. Please check your sources ??????This is a cut version of the original sequence (on purpose). Heusgen did NOT (!) cry after the Vance part! It seems like he simply at the very end got overwhelmed bc it’s also his last time as the msc leader. Please correct this. pic.twitter.com/FZvKxlsCqP

— Bastian Brauns (@BastianBrauns) February 17, 2025

5. Please read this whole Tweet by Ezra Levant on how the state will, he estimates, get to Jordan Peterson. The reasoning is excellent even if he is not correct about Peterson and what is coming for him by the state.

There is one aspect Levant omitted, perhaps because it wasn’t his main point. But it is ours.

The law as Ezra quotes it, is in fact the transformation from real human rights, meaning individual rights where there is an actual victim who has been violated in some way for reasons that are not connected to his actions, to fictional group rights. Trans people as a group, are only a real group the way a chess club is. They decided to be that, and made up their gender as apart from their sex, and demand that others submit to it, even if it changes every 2 hours. Enforcing, as the law says, “likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group”, we have moved fully from rule of law, to authoritarian and arbitrary rule where anyone who is a threat to state narratives is a criminal, and enforced on an as needed basis, but also on a quota. This will, not might, but will mean that asserting that 2+2=4 will be criminal when the state says it is anything other than 4.

Do click through and try and read the whole thing.

Here’s how they’re going to get you, @jordanbpeterson.

For years the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA) has banned discrimination against people based on “gender identity or expression”. You of course have never discriminated against anyone.

But this new bill adds s. 13 to the… https://t.co/QC2BDPnBqj pic.twitter.com/IeoTU1XyUT

— Ezra Levant ?? (@ezralevant) February 29, 2024

Full text:

Here’s how they’re going to get you,
@jordanbpeterson
.

For years the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA) has banned discrimination against people based on “gender identity or expression”. You of course have never discriminated against anyone.

But this new bill adds s. 13 to the CHRA, which now says that mere speech is considered discrimination if it is “likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group”.

So now, if someone watches one of your YouTube videos or reads on of your tweets about, say, transgender athletes changing in the girls change room, and as a result is “likely” to have hard feelings towards trans people, that’s hate speech.

That’s step 1. Here’s step 2.

Any member of the public (including non-citizens) can lodge a complaint against you to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal — an activist quasi-judicial tribunal run by non-judges, appointed by Trudeau.

They can get up to $20,000 per complaint from you — and they don’t have to be the “victim”. (There doesn’t have to be a victim at all — remember it’s a future crime. They only have to show that your tweet or video is “likely to” (i.e might) cause one person to have hard feelings about another person. $20,000 that you’d pay the complainant — plus $50,000 in fines to the government.

Per complaint.

So there could be a new complaint for every tweet you make. Every video. And the complainants can be professional busybodies and activists — they don’t have to be a “victim”.

Why wouldn’t woke activists literally file a CHRA complaint after every single thing you do or say on social media? It’s free. There’s no limit. Even if you “win”, you lose — the process is the punishment. And of course, they’re going to win. This will become an industry — to enrich woke grifters and destroy you financially.

But here’s the truly amazing part: the complainants can keep their identity a secret from you. Secret testimony from secret witnesses — who get paid up to $20,000 to take a run at you.

That’s how they’re going to come for you — and for us at
@RebelNewsOnline See screenshots.

Source: https://t.co/z40ukJ2M4f

Sign petition: https://t.co/3qHf3etjNz

Thank you all for checking out this site.

In discussing economics and so on with a friend, a thought occurred to me about how the US could actually get Canada to become a 51st state with little effort on their part.

A former colleague of mine once explained to me, that hyper-inflation is not related to inflation. We all know how inflation is caused, so no need to go into that. But his claim was that the reason hyper inflation happens, is the people of a country stop trusting the local currency and start trading in a foreign currency or some other system like barter. As a result, the local currency collapses because no one wants it. If you wish to use it to get something, the amount asked for will be ludicrous.

He went on to claim that the CIA may use this from time to time in order to destroy a currency. He claimed they did that recently under Biden to Lebanon.

Assuming any of this is true, or even that it would work that way, and it doesn’t seem improbable, in fact it seems intuitively correct, then the USA could get Canadians to beg to be the 51st state should the CIA pull an op like that. First, reduce the value of the $CDN to much lower than it is. Hypothetically and arbitrarily, say, 1$ USD = 3$ CDN to pick a number at random.

Pump Canada full of USD so that people start trading in it at the local retail level. Stores will do well because online that will be hard to do unless you have a mechanism to buy from a US credit card, which also could be made easier by the US come to think of it, or pay with debit out of a USD account at the bank. As faith in the $CDN collapses and people use USD more and more, all kinds of squeeze plays can be made to happen in Canada such that there would be only advantages to joining the US and no downsides. Although I pretty much see it that way already.

Secondly: On the booing at a hockey game during the US national anthem:

Many years ago, before Obama was president and applied heavy pressure on every counter-revolutionary influence he could, I used to read STATFOR as a main news source. At the time, it was the only place I could find actual information and analysis that wasn’t manipulative.

One of their essays was on how the left would hijack a demonstration for their purposes.

Picture yourself at a demo about some issue you feel strongly about. Not even a major thing, but it could be about housing or something in your area. A small group of leftists join the demo, and some have recorder-players of some kind. Some modern equivalent of what they used to call Ghetto blasters. They would on a signal start a chant, and play the chants on their machines such that it sounded like a lot of people were doing it, and naturally, the people at the demo would just Join in, thinking that was what they were supposed to do, even if there was some minor cognitive dissonance between the chant and the purpose of the demo.

I have experienced this personally at Parliament Hill.

Before the Freedom Convoy, there was nearly always a group of people of about 8 or so to around 40 who would protest the Covid measures. This was before Ford went full lapdog for Trudeau and he was making actual conservative noises and policies.

One man would always join the demo with anti Ford signs and would stand in front so all passers by would see his sign and assume the demo was anti-ford. I challenged him, and he revealed himself to be a full on socialist teacher, and was promoting the idea of transforming the education system into a Marxist one. At least he did show that much honesty in private conversation.

I tried explaining to the group what he was doing and no one seemed to care much. But what could they do really.

So it does not seem beyond the pail that the same government which has done so much illegal horror to Canadians in the past 9 years would plant a few people and some audio playback devices with boos recorded in order to seed a response from the crowd.

I don’t discount that it could have been a real response. But it feels unlikely that this was organic. It does feel a lot like say, for example, someone pulling the fire alarm at a federal court building right before John Carpay was to present evidence on February 13th as to why Trudeau should not be allowed to prorogue parliament for 11 weeks for political purposes. And yes, that happened. And as far as I know. no video of that person has appeared or arrest and arraignment made. Pretty sure though, that there is no where in the Federal Court building that isn’t on a security camera.