A few articles by Dr. Regina Wateel, author of Fisman’s Fraud

For those that don’t know her, Regina took on the herculean task of analyzing the Covid and Vaxx data from Ontario, and wrote a book exposing it as a total lie. This was not incompetence, or stupidity or error. But deliberate fabrication of, and distortion of actual data to force the various Covid measures which crippled Canada and much of the West for years.

She even titled her book, Fisman’s Fraud after the man who is mostly responsible in Ontario, David Fisman. Normally, a book titled So-and-so’s fraud and describing that fraud in the book would be grounds for a law suit. But interestingly, although Fisman himself has admitted awareness of the book, there is no sign of any legal action.

Here is a link to it in case anyone wants it, and I recommend getting it for several reasons.

1. It is a fantastic read. Although Dr. Wateel is a Ph.D in statistical analysis, the book reads like a mystery novel but contains all the court worthy evidence of the assertions within it.

2. Just showing a large number of sales of the book should put the fear of God into those who perpetrated this enormous and deadly fraud on Canada and beyond.

3. It makes a great gift to people just waking up to the reality of the West as it is now.

Regina also did an analysis of the recent Alberta study on Covid Measures.

ALBERTA’S DAMNING COVID-19 REPORT: What’s In it & What’s Missing

The recent report on Alberta’s COVID-19 pandemic response is a welcomed first step, hopefully of many, towards an open and honest dialogue about the COVID-19 debacle. While much of the information presented isn’t new to those who weren’t lobotomized by the relentless gaslighting, politicians and public health authorities have, until now, been able to keep such inconvenient facts from being officially recognized. This overdue recognition is, in itself, a very BIG deal.

The Alberta report is a damning indictment of the government’s pandemic response that needs to be leveraged to the fullest extent possible, but also reinforced.

The report made clear that it was the federal government who was in the driver’s seat when it came to the province’s pandemic response. Ultimately, decisions were based on federal and international recommendations as opposed to Alberta’s pre-existing pandemic response plan. However, the report doesn’t address WHY the Albertan government was so quick to hand over the keys and WHY they abandoned their own emergency plans. That question was outside the scope of the project.

The report did acknowledge that regulatory bodies essentially acted like mindless thugs, decrying any information that departed from the political narrative as misinformation and punishing any physician who refused to jeopardize their patients’ wellbeing by playing along.

Please click through for the rest:

There was also a major study done in Norway about all cause mortality by ‘vaccine’ status. This is Dr. Wateel’s analysis:

Salvaging the COVID-19 Vaccine Narrative

Many countries worldwide have experienced excess all-cause mortality (ACM) that coincides temporally with the COVID-19 mass vaccination campaigns. In a seeming attempt to salvage the “safe and effective” narrative, several studies have emerged to counter the conjecture that the COVID-19 vaccines may increase mortality risk. A recent preprint out of Norway (Dahl et al., 2024) presents one such study.

The authors compare the all-cause mortality rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals aged 18 years or older living in Norway during January 1, 2021 through to December 31, 2023. The study used individual-level data where individuals were categorized as either unvaccinated (received no doses), partially vaccinated (received one or two doses) or fully vaccinated (received three or more doses) from the date of vaccination and onwards. Based on their analysis, the authors conclude that vaccinated individuals had a lower rate of all-cause death during 2021-2023 in Norway, even after accounting for sex, calendar time, county of residence and a high-risk health indicator. The authors cite several other supporting studies that have concluded there was no observed increase in all-cause mortality in vaccinated individuals.

While it may seem that these studies are evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines reduced mortality (or at the very least did not contribute to it), that is not the case. Contained within these papers is evidence (falsification tests) that betray such a conclusion. In the end, these studies serve to highlight the inherent limitations of observational studies and demonstrate their potential for misuse. This is particularly problematic for those seeking to show that the C19 vaccines are “safe and effective,” a claim that was not sufficiently established during the clinical trials.

Please click through to read how the Norwegians created their fraudulent result by misrepresenting the data, and how journalists stood in line to republish the fake conclusions.

Here is a link to John Caray’s report on how he hopes Alberta doctors and others will respond to the Alberta report on Covid and the mRNA vaxx.

“Hopefully, these doctors will have a change of heart, and take the time to read the Final Report and respond thoughtfully to all its findings and recommendations.”

Alberta’s medical establishment feels very threatened by the Final Report of the Alberta COVID-19 Pandemic Data Review Task Force.

Commissioned by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, this 269-page report by eminent medical doctors and other distinguished scientists was released on January 24. The report is highly critical of the Alberta government’s lockdowns and vaccine passports as the response to COVID-19 and recommends different policies be used in future public health emergencies.

Three days after the Final Report was released, the Alberta Medical Association (AMA) issued a very short statement, just 64 words, denouncing the entire report as “biased, anti-science, anti-evidence, spreading misinformation,” and advancing “fringe approaches.” I have written about this in a previous column.

Two days after the AMA released its science-free rhetorical statement, 48 physicians and university professors endorsed an open letter to Smith and Alberta Health Minister Adriana LaGrange, calling on both to dismiss the Final Report in its entirety. The number of signatories has reportedly grown, since this open letter was released on January 29. 

One might hope that this open letter from doctors and other scientists would refute and rebut the Final Report’s voluminous contents and its detailed review of the government’s response to COVID-19. One might expect that scientists would explain why each and every one of the Final Report’s numerous recommendations are deeply flawed. After all, these experts have publicly called on the premier and health minister to dismiss all of the findings, conclusions and recommendations in a 269-page report.

John Carpay spoke in Ottawa on the 13th about his court case, asking the courts to undo Trudeau’s politically motivated prorogation of Parliament, which he presented to the Federal court also on the 13th. We hope to be able to post that video soon.