The Ugly Truth…: “Good spankings from Russia!”The Ugly Truth… : « Bonnes fessées de Russie ! »

Editorial by Nash:
The ground opened up beneath our feet.

The naughty little Zelensky had just been roundly scolded in front of the world by the mistress Trumpette and the principal JD Rasputin.

And suddenly the world had changed.

The word “diplomacy” was losing its flavor, its nature and even its meaning.

The quick passages in the Oval Office by the Englishman Keir Starmer and the Frenchman Emmanuel Macron have not changed anything.

As if the inevitable deal between the catatonic Russian and the uncultured buffoon from Mar-a-Lago was already written anyway.

It was still necessary to dare to bring down an “ally” and take on this staging of the father and mother who send their child to boarding school because he was not nice!

The ground has opened up and with it, the debate in the Twittersphere!

3 men and a friend (Russian)
A delight!

In the US, there are two camps. On one side, the pro-Trumps who vehemently bounce back on the ever-bigger lies of their leader before returning to their mobile home in Kansas: “350 billion given to Ukraine with no return!”, “not a single thank you from you, Mr. Zelensky!”, “you don’t respect us!”, “I know what’s happening on your front lines, I watch the news!” (That one, JD, I’m keeping to put on your grave, my friend! It pretty much sums up what you are!).

On the other hand, the vengeful Democrats who quickly forgot that it was their incompetence that cost them their defeat a few months ago and who are screaming scandal in blue and yellow, saying all the contempt they have for the uneducated, the SUVs and the Coca-Oreo lovers!

A sweet melody, then!

But that was without counting on our European votes.

I am not talking about those of our leaders who for once, and with the notable exception (it is Saturday when I write! It may change by the time you read this!) of Hungary and Italy, are exemplary and unanimously support the Ukrainian leader!

No, I’m still talking about the digital counters where a few trifle historians stand who remind you that Roosevelt must have spoken like that to De Gaulle, thus mixing bladders, lanterns, facts and style, historical figures and reality TV puppets, in an amusing way, especially considering that they are the same ones who were trying not long ago to excuse the ICT of Alien Musk’s right-hand man! (I warned you last week, I call him that now, it’s to better prepare him to go see if I’m there on Mars!).

So we could read that the difference between Yalta and yesterday was ultimately the “media coverage”… what stupidity! (I should point out that I know that De Gaulle was not at Yalta before I was sued on TikTok for gross ignorance!)

As a reminder, the relationship between the Allies and the leader of Free France was not good. At all. And political maneuvering, even in wartime, was a formidable weapon, far from the front! Roosevelt and Churchill intended that the French question be the responsibility of the Allies to the exclusion of any French participation… De Gaulle exhausted them and obtained what we know!

So relations were tense. Between allies of one and the same camp. And with the usual protocol: diplomacy is an iron fist in a velvet glove, always, but the words, they always remained calm, thoughtful and respectful of the customs…

What fell yesterday was the form!

And that some people find this normal by being satisfied with “the world has changed, we have to get used to it” is a simplistic capitulation.

No, the world has not changed: the men currently in power in some countries are trying to return to the Stone Age, and that is abnormal!

It is one thing to trample on the WHO, the WTO, the UN, all these relics of a past and outdated world order, but to dismiss centuries of diplomacy in front of the world’s media in order to ridicule a former friend whom we no longer want to shake hands with, is a total disgrace.

So we should resolve to see at the negotiating table a Putin decked out in a polar bear and a Trump next to his favorite chainsaw representative, if possible bare-chested, to further affirm that we are discussing “between balls”?

Little Volodymyr was naughty yesterday!

But personally, I found it good, given the circumstances!

For several reasons that I will explain: first of all, it is difficult to enter into a heated conversation in a language that is not your own. I have heard my opponents tell me “yes, he speaks English very well and can make himself understood very well”… So excuse me, Michel, but no, you see this through the prism of your CM2 level of English, you have never set foot in a negotiation other than that of your trustee to restore your facade, and you have not known war, so shut up! (I also know how to act like an angry guy in the baujo, eh!)

No, to argue in a foreign language, you have to master the language. Ask your friends who live with a partner who is not from here, and you will have your answer.

Then, he had to keep calm (or serious? The question would arise if the situation were not so serious!) in the face of the lies of the Trumpette and Reverend Vance: complex when you are told in your face that someone knows the history of your country better than you (the dates on Crimea being a fantastic moment during which Trump tries to fit in that this annexation was in 2015… before retracting by saying “it was before me!” FUCK CUT OFF MY ARM SO I CAN FLOGGATE MYSELF WITH SOMETHING!!!)

Between hypocrisy and farce, the play offered for the White House fair to the entire world therefore required that friend Zelensky remain calm, which he tried to do until an element of language allowed an opening to his hosts (we would have forgotten that he was their guest!) and they reproached him for “raising his voice” and that it was a serious “lack of respect” for the United States… and then the storm broke out!

 

You didn’t say thank you!

What did we get for our billions!?

You have no more soldiers!

You are in no position to ask for anything!

He who says it is there!

Bisque Bisquera!

And Na!

But there is also a somewhat far-fetched hypothesis which could not justify the attitude of the US executive yesterday, but explain this recourse to this idiotic violence at the end of the argument after the “drink too many”…

And what if, behind Zelensky’s back, ‘The Trumpette and his Potine’ had negotiated an agreement thinking they could put Ukraine’s back to the wall? A sort of “if you want my support that I don’t really guarantee, you give up what I tell you to the Russian right away and your basements to my US companies” or else, “if you say no, well I’ll stop helping you right away! You no longer have US support.”

Source- nashsuglytruth.substack.com